Where Facebook got it wrong

Posted in Digital, Mel Varley, Latest reporters' blogs November 21st, 2007 by Melinda Varley

facebookThe beginning of social networks was Friend’s Reunited where people could keep in touch with classmates, not the world. Where did it all go wrong?

About six years ago I remember my father telling me about this new site he had found that enabled him to get in contact with people he used to go to school with. A few weeks later we were having various people over for dinner. Does Facebook have this same potential?

Friend’s Reunited was the real ‘phenomena’ as it was the first such site. It really did put people back in contact or at least give people the chance to snoop on their old school friends and see what they are up to. Unfortunately, it’s not as successful and is now to now dropping its subscription fee to entice users back to the site.

Facebook seems to have gone a slightly different way. First and foremost Facebook was about getting in contact with close friends and sharing photos and communicating as we would on Instant Messaging services. 

Now it seems users of Facebook are all in one big competition to see who can get the most friends. Today, I had a ‘friend detail’ request from a guy I never said more than two words to in high school. Why would he add me – because we happen to have some ‘mutual friends’?

Blake Chandlee, now Facebook’s commercial director, has said today (21.11.07) that Facebook aims to “help people manage their real world lives in a more efficient manner.’

Forgive me for saying, but I was doing just fine before Facebook took over my lunch hour. Facebook, while it says it sets out to ‘bring people together’ and ‘unite us’, seems to prevent us from doing just that.

I am certain that there are millions of users out there with hundreds of people on their friends’ list that they never actually talk to or meet up with, but just have listed as a friend to impress the friends they actually do see.

Where Friends Reunited got it right was how it brought people in contact from only a certain period of their lives. Most of us can’t keep up with our friends on Facebook, let alone have an interest in what they are now doing for a living or where they are going on holiday next month. Have our profile pages got so big that they aren’t actually a true reflection of ourselves anymore? And if not, what’s the point?!

To read the news story related to this blog visit mad.co.uk

Comments (2)

ellie wallis’s comment is....

Add comment
Back to top

Who cares if our facebook account does not reflect the real selves? Surely a web page can never represent a person in any form, I think you are missing the point.

Facebook is like a mobile phone list but with detail. There are some people you ‘ring’ more often than others. And some who just sit in the list because you happened to meet or go to school once. There is no need to delete these unused numbers/facebook profiles simply because you do not use them anymore or have put them on a back burner. One day that person may be on top of the agenda again.

For some it is all about numbers; how many friends you have in the list but this is just because they have obviously met more people and do not censor who gets to see their profile and photos.

At the end of the day, everyone is different and use Facebook in different ways which is the beauty of it. And to be fair, Friends Reunited was dated, hard to use and you had to pay to get any decent use out of it at all, and it limited you to school friends.

Melinda Varley’s comment is....

Add comment
Back to top

The point is it did quite literally bring people together rather than have people accept as many ‘friends’ as they could, staging a popularity contest, like Facebook does. Is Facebook for you and your ‘friends’ or a place for you to meet people…or both? What is Facebook’s clear goal and purpose?

Your comment is....

You must be logged in to post a comment.

madcomments encourages comments to be short and to the point. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.

Archives