Green backs…I mean banks
Posted in Marketing, Mel Varley, Latest reporters' blogs July 4th, 2007 by Melinda Varley
Who would have ever thought that the name of a colour would prove to be such a successful marketing tool?
The term ‘green’ has been waved around by marketers as if it were a white flag in a war. Only problem is, simply saying the term will certainly not mean a cease fire during our war with mother nature.
This week, two major highs street banks, HSBC and Barclays have launched major ‘green’ initiatives including Barclays ‘green’ credit card Breathe and HSBC’s ‘green’ current account. Both banks promise their products are made with the environment and climate change in mind but is it really enough to make a difference?
We all saw what happened with the RED campaign, launched by Bono and supported by some very wealthy brands such as American Express and Motorola. But the campaign cost more money then it actually raised and drew black clouds over the whole ‘large corporations can save the world’ premise.
Virgin Money has also launched its own ‘green’ initiatives but unfortunately saying you are ‘green’ only raises your profile and does not actually cut carbon emissions, stop the rain and floods, reduce waste (not by much anyway) or put an end to our over consumption of cheap flights and expensive cars.
While ‘green’ may raise awareness that a company is at least thinking about their impact and carbon footprints, does it only trick consumers into thinking they are actually doing something about it and making a contribution?
(1)
JunkkMale’s comment is....
Or, worse, if not done with genuine intent, long term commitment and tangible follow-through, does it just add to the level of ‘green noise’ that is already saturating the airwaves, and further contributes to the public tuning out?
My little site gets a press release every few days from some bank or other saying how they have gone carbon neutral, or some supermarket to say they are switching to green energy.
Good on them! But as a consumer, other than meeting a legislative obligation or reducing running costs this impacts me how, exactly?
I have always written back to applaud their moves, but go on to suggest that to get my little online resource to publish their PR it would need to be a tad more tangible in the area of actual savings to planet AND said consumer.
In the case of banks, this could take the form of low or at-cost loans to put in insulation. A loss-leader to get custom at a later stage. If they end up saving money on energy, once they go into profit then they may wish to buy into something else that requires finance… hopefully something equally responsible.
Some have moved in that direction, but most, sadly, seem more keen to bank the money and invest more on spun veneer than actual substance.
Which seems quite a waste.
Posted July 5th, 2007 at 2:10 pm
Your comment is....
You must be logged in to post a comment.
madcomments encourages comments to be short and to the point. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.
- Advertising (192)
- Arif Durrani (50)
- Branwell Johnson (104)
- Creative (53)
- Design (12)
- Digital (97)
- Direct Marketing (13)
- General (135)
- Jim Prior (2)
- Latest reporters’ blogs (347)
- Lucy Tesseras (15)
- Marketing (198)
- Media (210)
- Mel Varley (108)
- Nikki Preston (47)
- Oliver Milman (43)
- Russell Parsons (13)
- Stuart Aitken (1)





