Dr Martens sticks boot in
Posted in Advertising, Creative, Branwell Johnson May 29th, 2007 by Branwell Johnson
Commentators are queuing up to castigate Saatchi & Saatchi’s Dr Marten campaign. The agency has taken flak for its use of dead rock stars in an apparent one off magazine campaign and the venerable British brand has dropped the agency.
I do have to wonder what the fuss is about.
Yes, the use of dead people’s images in campaigns without some kind of family agreement does make me queasy but it is legal and it happens all the time with agencies plundering old film footage to use dead stars like Marilyn Monroe or Steve McQueen in campaigns. And don’t even get me started on the use of imagery of Che Guevara in theme bars and on T-shirts. Speaking of which, what about all those bootleg T shirt sellers making moolah by using Kurt Cobain’s image without permission? Why aren’t people turning over their stalls and setting light to the stock?
Calling the ads bad taste is pretty rich when you are talking about Sid Vicious, a man who used Swastika imagery to provoke and outrage while The Ramones aren’t short of offensive lyrics – “Cretin Bop” or “I just wanna sniff some glue.”
Dr Marten’s has good grounds to sack Saatchi’s if the ads were “unauthorised”.” The company should have control over its campaigns. But on the grounds of good taste? C’mon, isn’t everybody “turning rebellion into money?”
(6)
Stuart Aitken’s comment is....
Dr Marten’s? Surely it would make more sense for Converse - ahem…Nike - to advertise on the back - or feet - of Kurt. He did die wearing them after all.
Posted May 30th, 2007 at 9:01 am
Branwell Johnson’s comment is....
Hello Stuart, indeed Kurt popped his clogs in Converse - but that wouldn’t be v good taste for an ad campaign would it? Shoes the stars have died in…
Posted May 30th, 2007 at 9:38 am
It’s interesting to see that whilst Dr Martins consider it bad taste to feature dead icons in their advertising in order to sell product, the D&AD deem it to be a stroke of near-creative genius, having shortlisted BBC Radio 2’s ‘Elvis’ TV ad by Cut & Run Ltd for a pencil in this year’s awards. If a dead Kurt can’t wear DMs, why can a dead Elvis have Sugar Babes on backing vocals? Just where do you draw the line?
Posted May 30th, 2007 at 11:53 am
JunkkMale’s comment is....
This commentator (never been called that before, so I’m climbing aboard the bandwagon) couldn’t care less about the ad (though asking the relatives might have been polite), but is fascinated by the process surrounding the apparent ‘furore’. Was that the term in the original release used to kick-start it?
When I first read about this it seemed to be some kind of student competition that got taken too far, and without the knowledge of senior agency or client. So far, so tee-hee…whoopsie: ‘They didn’t die with our boots on?”
Now it seems it is/was a commissioned piece, using a high-profile photographer, for a one-off ‘authorised’ insertion in some medium I’ve never heard of, like that would render it in better taste than being seen anywhere else. As most awards hounds will tell you, it’s quite easy to get a dodgy bit of ‘edginess’ mainstream with a complicit agency/client/minor-medium cabal, a little bit of MySpace or YouTube to ‘find’ it has been spread around, with a nudge from the PR division to kickstart the Daily Mail, and…ta-daa: a bit more than was ‘intended’.
So… what next? It was all actually a big hoot to get a bunch more PR value than the original, rather average concept warranted. Surely not?
Bless.
Posted May 31st, 2007 at 1:06 pm
digitalink’s comment is....
I think that the reason why it’s acceptable to find Elvis in corny ads and why there is such a backlash against Kurt is that they both embraced life differently. Elvis was all flash and glam, while Kurt, who probably didn’t like the price of DMs (which is why he wore Cons’), was about being independent from the corporate world. But this isn’t the worst thing that’s happened to Kurt since he died. His music is now part of video game thanks to his “loving” widow.
Posted June 11th, 2007 at 1:15 am
I am a mother and my son used to wear Dr Martens, he killed himself. I have been going through hell as well as his 12 year old brother, and if we had see my son in a ad for Dr Martens to sell products, I think we both would have breakdowns! How can anyone think of doing this? It makes me so sick!
Posted June 18th, 2007 at 6:36 pm
Your comment is....
You must be logged in to post a comment.
madcomments encourages comments to be short and to the point. Comments should show a courteous regard for the presence of other voices in the discussion. We reserve the right to edit or delete comments that do not adhere to this standard.
- Advertising (218)
- Arif Durrani (51)
- Branwell Johnson (132)
- Creative (60)
- Design (14)
- Digital (100)
- Direct Marketing (15)
- General (137)
- Jim Prior (2)
- Latest reporters’ blogs (401)
- Lucy Tesseras (15)
- Marketing (231)
- Media (234)
- Mel Varley (108)
- Nikki Preston (47)
- Oliver Milman (43)
- Russell Parsons (37)
- Stuart Aitken (1)





